Comments

[this is good]
AMEN!
This certainly correlates with my own memory of the start of the war and the reasons for it. About the only legal argument one can raise is about Security Council resolution 1441, but the fact remains that if Saddam Hussein violated it, there would be a consequence. That was always it, and always what I have maintained, too. Hindsight tells me that that message was clouded and the US could have done a better job telling its citizens that, but it’s easy to say that in 2008. David Horowitz is so right with his accurate recollection of history.
Bush should have made David Horowitz his communicator to the American people five years ago. Never give up stating the facts, never falter in naming the enemy and revealing their efforts. Never falter in naming the traitors and their activities. This should be on the news every night. This should be in the papers every day. This should be on billboards on the highways and byways. We should be so informed that the enemies in our midst, who claim to love America would be shamed in their behavior daily for their actions.
I totally agree, Judge Bob—Horowitz is an excellent communicator and he doesn’t go around pandering to revisionism as the Democrats are so happy to do.
Jack Yan has 2 post in connection with this subject. Both of these history reminder post are good and necessary reads.

David Horowitz on the reasons for the Iraq war


Tony Blair on the reasons for the Iraq war
[這個好]
Thank you for the links!
I remember Tony Blair was very eloquent in his speech. It sure convinced me when I watched it live in 2003.
[this is good]
Thanks! Exposing media bias and revisionist history is always good.

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in

Advertisement

  • Powered by Vox